Effect of a personalized nutritional intervention program on nutritional status, quality of life and mortality in hemodialysis patients / Efecto de un programa de intervención nutricional personalizado en el estado nutricional, calidad de vida y mortalidad en pacientes en hemodiálisis

Objective: dietary advice provided through a nutritional intervention program (NIP) is recommended by renal clinic guidelines to prevent or treat malnutrition, that could improve quality of life (QoL) and survival in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study set out to evaluate the effect of a personalized NIP on the nutritional status and its impact on QoL and mortality in dialyzed patients. Material and methods: this was a 12-month intervention study with regular follow-up in which nutritional parameters were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. QoL was assessed by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life version 1.2 (KDQOL-SF) at baseline and at the end of the study. All dialyzed patients received individualized consultations with a trained dietitian. The content of the nutritional education program included a personalized meal plan and educational materials addressing nutrition to manage fluids, electrolytes, and vitamin D. Results: a total of 75 patients were included. After the NIP, visceral proteins, phosphorous, potassium and vitamin D levels had improved significantly (p < 0.001). The percentage of well-nourished patients increased by 30 % (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, the well-nourished patients had significantly improved scores on the general summary areas of the KDQOL-SF, reduced worry concerning fluid and dietary restrictions (p < 0.001), and the survival rate was 12 months longer (p < 0.01). Conclusion: the results of this study suggest that personalized NIP contributed to improved nutritional status, QoL and survival in HD patients. (AU)

Objetivo: el asesoramiento dietético proporcionado a través de un programa de intervención nutricional (PIN) es recomendado por las guías clínicas renales para prevenir o tratar la desnutrición, puediendo mejorar la calidad de vida (CV) y la supervivencia en pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de un PNI personalizado sobre el estado nutricional y su impacto en la calidad de vida y la mortalidad en pacientes dializados. Material y métodos: estudio de intervención de 12 meses de duración, con seguimiento periódico de los pacientes en el que se midieron los parámetros nutricionales al inicio, a los 6 y 12 meses. La CV fue evaluada por el cuestionario Kidney Disease Quality of Life versión 1.2 (KDQOL-SF) al inicio y al final del estudio. Todos los pacientes dializados recibieron consultas individualizadas con un dietista. El contenido del programa de educación nutricional incluyó un plan de alimentación personalizado y materiales educativos sobre nutrición para el manejo de fluidos, electrolitos y vitamina D. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 75 pacientes. Después del PIN, los niveles de proteínas viscerales, fósforo, potasio y vitamina D habían mejorado significativamente (p < 0,001). El porcentaje de pacientes bien nutridos aumentó un 30 % (p < 0,001). Al final del estudio, los pacientes bien nutridos mejoraron significativamente las puntuaciones en las áreas de resumen general del KDQOL-SF, redujeron la preocupación por las restricciones dietéticas y de líquidos (p < 0,001) y la tasa de supervivencia fue de 12 meses superior (p < 0,01). Conclusión: los resultados de este estudio sugieren que el PIN personalizado contribuyó a mejorar el estado nutricional, la calidad de vida y la supervivencia en pacientes en HD. (AU)

Estimating the association between systemic Interleukin-6 and mortality in the dialysis population. Re-analysis of the global fluid study, systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation, measured as circulating Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease. However, this has not been convincingly demonstrated in a systematic review or a meta-analysis in the dialysis population. We provide such evidence, including a re-analysis of the GLOBAL Fluid Study. METHODS: Mortality in the GLOBAL fluid study was re-analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression with IL-6 levels as a covariate using a continuous non-logarithmic scale. Literature searches of the association of IL-6 levels with mortality were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PyschINFO and CENTRAL. All studies were assessed for risk of bias using the QUIPS tool. To calculate a pooled effect size, studies were grouped by use of IL-6 scale and included in the meta-analysis if IL-6 was analysed as a continuous linear covariate, either per unit or per 10 pg/ml, in both unadjusted or adjusted for other patient characteristics (e.g. age, comorbidity) models. Funnel plot was used to identify potential publication bias. RESULTS: Of 1886 citations identified from the electronic search, 60 were included in the qualitative analyses, and 12 had sufficient information to proceed to meta-analysis after full paper screening. Random effects meta-analysis of 11 articles yielded a pooled hazard ratio (HR) per pg/ml of 1.03, (95% CI 1.01, 1.03), [Formula: see text]= 81%. When the analysis was confined to seven articles reporting a non-adjusted HR the result was similar: 1.03, per pg/ml (95% CI: 1.03, 1.06), [Formula: see text]=92%. Most of the heterogeneity could be attributed to three of the included studies. Publication bias could not be determined due to the limited number of studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review confirms the adverse association between systemic IL-6 levels and survival in people treated with dialysis. The heterogeneity that we observed may reflect differences in study case mix. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO - CRD42020214198.

El acceso vascular en el paciente anciano en hemodiálisis: resultados y supervivencia / Vascular access in elderly hemodialysis patients: Results and surviva

Introducción: A pesar de los intentos de la iniciativa “fístula primero”, la realidad es que un porcentaje nada desdeñable de pacientes en hemodiálisis siguen dializándose a través de un catéter, y esto es especialmente relevante en los pacientes ancianos. Objetivos: Conocer y sintetizar la evidencia científica existente sobre los resultados del acceso vascular en el paciente anciano en hemodiálisis.Metodología: Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus y WOS. Se utilizaron como descriptores los siguientes términos: Hemodiálisis (“Hemodialysis”), Acceso Vascular (“Vascular Access”) y Mortalidad (“Mortality”), combinándolos entre sí utilizando el operador booleano AND. Se incluyeron artículos cuya publicación estuviese comprendida entre 2017 y 2023 en inglés y español. Resultados: Se incluyeron 15 artículos: una revisión y diferentes estudios observacionales. Tras el análisis de estos, se ha evidenciado el incremento del uso de catéteres del paciente anciano, relacionándose con elevadas tasas de infecciones y peor supervivencia. El uso del catéter está relacionado con mayor comorbilidad y edad. Conclusión: La fístula arteriovenosa sigue siendo el acceso vascular de elección en todos los pacientes en hemodiálisis, sin embargo, el uso del catéter ha experimentado un aumento importante en los pacientes ancianos, debido posiblemente a menor esperanza de vida y comorbilidad asociada a estas personas. Este aumento de su utilización se ha relacionado con un aumento importante de la mortalidad. A pesar de ello, en el paciente mayor, no está claro si el aumento de la mortalidad se debe al catéter o a las características basales del paciente. (AU)

Introduction: Despite the efforts of the “fistula first” initiative, the reality is that a significant percentage of hemodialysis patients continue to receive dialysis through a catheter, and this is especially relevant in elderly patients. Objectives: To understand and synthesize the existing scientific evidence regarding vascular access outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients.Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases. The following terms were used as descriptors: “Hemodialysis”, “Vascular Access”, and “Mortality”, combined using the Boolean operator AND. Articles published between 2017 and 2023 in English and Spanish were included. Results: Fifteen articles were included: one review and various observational studies. Upon analysis, an increase in the use of catheters in elderly patients was observed, which was associated with high infection rates and worse survival outcomes. Catheter use was linked to higher comorbidity and older age.Conclusion: Arteriovenous fistula remains the preferred vascular access in all hemodialysis patients; however, the use of catheters has significantly increased in elderly patients, possibly due to lower life expectancy and associated comorbidities in this population. This increase in catheter utilization has been associated with a significant rise in mortality. Nevertheless, in older patients, it is not clear whether the increased mortality is attributable to the catheter itself or the baseline characteristics of the patient. (AU)

Vascular access type and mortality in elderly incident hemodialysis patients / Tipo de acceso vascular y mortalidad en pacientes ancianos en programa de hemodiálisis

Introduction: The ideal vascular access type for elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients remains debatable. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD and mortality in elderly patients. Methods: Single-center retrospective study of 99 incident HD patients aged≥80 years from January 2010 to May 2021. Patients were categorized according to their patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD: central venous catheter (CVC) only, CVC to arteriovenous fistula (AVF), AVF to CVC, and AVF only. Baseline clinical data were compared among groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox's proportional hazards model. Results: When compared with CVC to AVF, mortality risk was significantly higher among CVC only patients and similar to AVF only group [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32–2.51)]. Ischemic heart disease [HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.02–2.96)], lower levels of albumin [HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.28–3.64)] and hemoglobin [HR 4.10(95% CI 1.69–9.92)], and higher levels of c-reactive protein [HR 1.87(95% CI 1.11–3.14)] were also associated with increased mortality risk in our cohort, p<0.05. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that placement of an AVF during the early stages of dialysis was associated with lower mortality compared to persistent CVC use among elderly patients. AVF placement appears to have a positive impact on survival outcomes, even in those who started dialysis with a CVC. (AU)

Introducción: El tipo de acceso vascular ideal para pacientes ancianos en hemodiálisis (HD) sigue siendo discutible. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la asociación entre los patrones de uso del acceso vascular en el primer año de HD y la mortalidad en pacientes ancianos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de 99 pacientes incidentes en HD con edades ≥80años desde enero de 2010 hasta mayo de 2021. Los pacientes fueron categorizados según sus patrones de uso del acceso vascular en el primer año de HD: catéter venoso central (CVC) solo, CVC a fístula arteriovenosa (FAV), FAV a CVC y FAV solamente. Los datos clínicos iniciales se compararon entre los grupos. Los resultados de supervivencia se analizaron mediante las curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y el modelo de riesgo proporcional de Cox. Resultados: En comparación con el CVC para la FAV, el riesgo de mortalidad fue significativamente mayor entre los pacientes que solo recibieron CVC y similar al grupo que solo utilizó FAV (HR: 0,93; IC95%: 0,32-2,51). Cardiopatía isquémica (HR: 1,74; IC95%: 1,02-2,96), niveles más bajos de albúmina (HR: 2,16; IC 95%: 1,28-3,64) y de hemoglobina (HR: 4,10; IC 95%: 1,69-9,92), y niveles más altos de proteína C reactiva (HR: 1,87; IC 95%: 1,11-3,14) también se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de mortalidad en nuestra cohorte (p<0,05). Conclusión: Nuestros hallazgos sugirieron que la colocación de una FAV durante las primeras etapas de la diálisis se asoció con una menor mortalidad en comparación con el uso persistente de CVC en pacientes ancianos. La colocación de una FAV parece tener un impacto positivo en los resultados de supervivencia, incluso en aquellos que comenzaron la diálisis con un CVC. (AU)

Association between serum ß2-microglobulin levels and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in chinese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between serum ß2-microglobulin (ß2M) levels and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is inconclusive. Furthermore, no study has been performed in China on the significance of serum ß2M levels in MHD patients. Therefore, this study investigated the aforementioned association in MHD patients. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 521 MHD patients were followed at Dalian Municipal Central Hospital affiliated with Dalian University of Technology from December 2019 to December 2021. The serum ß2M levels were categorized into three tertiles, and the lowest tertile served as the reference group. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding patients with CVD at baseline. RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 21.4 ± 6.3 months, there were 106 all-cause deaths, of which 68 were caused by CVD. When excluding CVD patients at baseline, there were 66 incident CVEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in the highest tertile of serum ß2M levels was significantly higher than that in the lowest tertile (P < 0.05), but not for the CVEs (P > 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, serum ß2M levels were positively associated with the risk of all-cause (HR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.21-4.17) and CVD (HR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.19-5.43) mortality, and a linear trend was evident (P < 0.05). Besides, the results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with the main findings. However, we didn't observed the significant association between serum ß2M levels and CVEs (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The serum ß2M level may be a significant predictor of the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in MHD patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

High facility-level serum potassium variability associated with mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from Chinese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

The role of facility-level serum potassium (sK+) variability (FL-SPV) in dialysis patients has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FL-SPV and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients using data from the China Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) 5. FL-SPV was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of baseline sK+ of all patients in each dialysis center. The mean and SD values of FL-SPV of all participants were calculated, and patients were divided into the high FL-SPV (>the mean value) and low FL-SPV (≤the mean value) groups. Totally, 1339 patients were included, with a mean FL-SPV of 0.800 mmol/L. Twenty-three centers with 656 patients were in the low FL-SPV group, and 22 centers with 683 patients were in the high FL-SPV group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver cirrhosis (OR = 4.682, 95% CI: 1.246-17.593), baseline sK+ (<3.5 vs. 3.5 ≤ sK+ < 5.5 mmol/L, OR = 2.394, 95% CI: 1.095-5.234; ≥5.5 vs. 3.5 ≤ sK+ < 5.5 mmol/L, OR = 1.451, 95% CI: 1.087-1.939), dialysis <3 times/week (OR = 1.472, 95% CI: 1.073-2.020), facility patients' number (OR = 1.088, 95% CI: 1.058-1.119), serum HCO3- level (OR = 0.952, 95% CI: 0.921-0.984), dialysis vintage (OR = 0.919, 95% CI: 0.888-0.950), other cardiovascular disease (OR = 0.508, 95% CI: 0.369-0.700), and using high-flux dialyzer (OR = 0.425, 95% CI: 0.250-0.724) were independently associated with high FL-SPV (all p < .05). After adjusting potential confounders, high FL-SPV was an independent risk factor for all-cause death (HR = 1.420, 95% CI: 1.044-1.933) and cardiovascular death (HR = 1.827, 95% CI: 1.188-2.810). Enhancing the management of sK+ of hemodialysis patients and reducing FL-SPV may improve patient survival.

Análisis de las complicaciones del acceso vascular en hemodiálisis. Una revisión sistemática / Analysis of complications of vascular access in hemodialysis: A systematic review

Introducción:El acceso vascular sigue siendo uno de los retos más importantes en todas las unidades de diálisis, por todas las complicaciones derivadas de su uso y el gran impacto en la mor-bimortalidad del enfermo renal. Los tres tipos de acceso vascu-lar más utilizados son la fístula arteriovenosa nativa, el injerto o fístula arteriovenosa protésica y el catéter venoso central. Objetivo: Analizar y evaluar la situación actual y la incidencia de las complicaciones relacionadas con los diferentes accesos vasculares en hemodiálisis. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS y SciELO. Se incluyeron todos los artículos originales de menos de 5 años de antigüe-dad en los que uno de sus objetivos fuera analizar la preva-lencia o incidencia de las complicaciones de cualquier acceso vascular en hemodiálisis en población adulta. Resultados: El número de artículos para el análisis fueron 15. De ellos, 14 fueron estudios observacionales y uno, un ensa-yo clínico multicéntrico. Se analizaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, la prevalencia de complicaciones entre todos los accesos vasculares y la incidencia de complicaciones se-gún fístula nativa/protésica/catéter venoso central.Conclusiones: La fístula arteriovenosa nativa es el acceso vas-cular de elección ya que tiene tasas de complicaciones muy bajas. De entre ellas, la trombosis, es la complicación con más incidencia. El uso de catéter venoso central todavía es muy habitual, pese a ser el acceso vascular que presenta mayores tasas de complicaciones como las infecciones y la bacteriemia, produciéndose en un 10%-17% de los pacientes portadores.(AU)

Introduction: Vascular access remains one of the most important challenges in all dialysis units due to the complications associated with its use and its significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of renal patients. The three most used types of vascular access are native arteriovenous fistula, graft or prosthetic arteriovenous fistula, and central venous catheter. Objective: To analyze and evaluate the current situation and incidence of complications related to different vascular accesses in hemodialysis. Methodology : A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and SciELO databases. All original articles published within the last 5 years that aimed to analyze the prevalence or incidence of complications related to any vascular access in hemodialysis in the adult population were included. Results: A total of 15 articles were included for analysis. Among them, 14 were observational studies, and one was a multicenter clinical trial. Demographic data of the patients, the prevalence of complications across all vascular accesses, and the incidence of complications for native fistula/prosthetic fistula/central venous catheter were analyzed. Conclusions: Native arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access due to its very low complication rates. Among the complications, thrombosis has the highest incidence. The use of central venous catheters is still common, despite having higher rates of complications such as infections and bacteremia, occurring in 10%-17% of the patients.(AU)

Medium Cut-Off versus Low-Flux Dialyzers in Hemodialysis Patients with COVID-19: Clinical Outcomes and Reduction in Interleukin-6.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused extensive morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) patients are both vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and tend to suffer greater disease severity and mortality. This retrospective study aimed to compare medium cut-off (MCO) and low-flux (LF) membrane dialyzers in terms of interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduction, change in inflammatory state, intradialytic complications, and mortality in chronic HD patients with COVID-19. METHOD: HD patients with a confirmed COVID-19 infection were admitted to the hospital for 10-14 days and underwent HD at the COVID-HD unit. Choice of dialyzer membrane used (MCO vs. LF) depended on the primary nephrologist(s). We collected data on demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory results, diagnosis, treatments, HD prescription, hemodynamic status during HD, and mortality at 14 and 28 days after. RESULTS: IL-6 reduction ratio (RR) in the MCO group was 9.7 (interquartile range, 71.1) percent, which was significantly higher than that of the LF group (RR, -45.7 [interquartile range, 70.2] percent). The incidence rate of intradialytic hypotension in the MCO group was 3.846 events per 100 dialysis hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.954-6.856), which was significantly lower than that of the LF group (9.057; 95% CI, 5.592-13.170). Overall, mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The MCO membrane was more effective in removing IL-6 and was better tolerated than the LF membrane. Large, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the relative benefits of the MCO membrane, especially mortality. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our results suggest that the MCO membrane may be beneficial in chronic HD patients with COVID-19.

Association of Four Types of Vascular Access Including Arterial Superficialization with Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular access usage varies widely across countries. Previous studies have evaluated the association of clinical outcomes with the three types of vascular access, namely, arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), and tunneled and cuffed central venous catheter (TC-CVC). However, little is known regarding the association between arterial superficialization (AS) and the mortality of patients. METHODS: A nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry (2006-2007). We included patients aged ≥20 years undergoing hemodialysis with a dialysis vintage ≥6 months. The exposures of interest were the four types of vascular access: AVF, AVG, AS, and TC-CVC. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations of vascular access types with 1-year all-cause and cause-specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 183,490 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included: 90.7% with AVF, 6.9% with AVG, 2.0% with AS, and 0.4% with TC-CVC. During the 1-year follow-up period, 13,798 patients died. Compared to patients with AVF, those with AVG, AS, and TC-CVC had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounding factors: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) - 1.30 (1.20-1.41), 1.56 (1.39-1.76), and 2.15 (1.77-2.61), respectively. Similar results were obtained for infection-related and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: This nationwide cohort study conducted in Japan suggested that AVF usage may have the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. The study also suggested that the usage of AS may be associated with better survival rates compared to those of TC-CVC in patients who are not suitable for AVF or AVG.

A new approach to predicting mortality in dialysis patients using sociodemographic features based on artificial intelligence.

One of the main problems that affect patients in dialysis therapy who are on the waiting list to receive a kidney transplant is predicting their survival time if they do not receive a transplant. This paper proposes a new approach to survival prediction based on artificial intelligence techniques combined with statistical methods to study the association between sociodemographic factors and patient survival on the waiting list if they do not receive a kidney transplant. This new approach consists of a first stage that uses the clustering techniques that are best suited to the data structure (K-Means, Mini Batch K-Means, Agglomerative Clustering and K-Modes) used to identify the risk profile of dialysis patients. Later, a new method called False Clustering Discovery Reduction is performed to determine the minimum number of populations to be studied, and whose mortality risk is statistically differentiable. This approach was applied to the OPTN medical dataset (n = 44,663). The procedure started from 11 initial clusters obtained with the Agglomerative technique, and was reduced to eight final risk populations, for which their Kaplan-Meier survival curves were provided. With this result, it is possible to make predictions regarding the survival time of a new patient who enters the waiting list if the sociodemographic profile of the patient is known. To do so, the predictive algorithm XGBoost is used, which allows the cluster to which it belongs to be predicted and the corresponding Kaplan-Meier curve to be associated with it. This prediction process is achieved with an overall Multi-class AUC of 99.08 %.

Sex disparities in mortality among patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis.

Females are known to have a better survival rate than males in the general population, but previous studies have shown that this superior survival is diminished in patients on dialysis. This study aimed to investigate the risk of mortality in relation to sex among Korean patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). A total of 4994 patients with kidney failure who were receiving dialysis were included for a prospective nationwide cohort study. Cox multivariate proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between sex and the risk of cause-specific mortality according to dialysis modality. During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the death rate per 100 person-years was 6.4 and 8.3 in females and males, respectively. The female-to-male mortality rate in patients on dialysis was 0.77, compared to 0.85 in the general population. In adjusted analyses, the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.87, P < 0.001). No significant differences in the risk of cardiovascular and infection-related deaths were observed according to sex. The risk of mortality due to sudden death, cancer, other, or unknown causes was significantly lower for females than males in the entire population (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, P < 0.001), in patients on HD (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90, P = 0.003), and in patients on PD (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.70, P < 0.001). The survival advantage of females in the general population was maintained in Korean dialysis patients, which was attributed to a lower risk of noncardiovascular and noninfectious death.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00931970.

Diabetes acts on mortality in hemodialysis patients predicted by asymmetric dimethylarginine and inflammation.

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of diabetic patients on dialysis is higher than that of non-diabetic patients. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and inflammation are strong predictors of death in hemodialysis. This study aimed to evaluate asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein interaction in predicting mortality in hemodialysis according to the presence or absence of diabetes. METHODS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein were measured in 202 patients in maintenance hemodialysis assembled from 2011 to 2012 and followed for four years. Effect modification of C-reactive protein on the relationship between asymmetric dimethylarginine and all-cause mortality was investigated dividing the population into four categories according to the median of asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein levels were similar between diabetics and non-diabetics. Asymmetric dimethylarginine - median IQR µM - (1.95 1.75-2.54 versus 1.03 0.81-1.55 P=0.000) differed in non-diabetics with or without evolution to death (HR 2379 CI 1.36-3.68 P=0.000) and was similar in diabetics without or with evolution to death. Among non-diabetics, the category with higher asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein levels exhibited the highest mortality (69.0% P=0.000). No differences in mortality were seen in diabetics. A joint effect was found between asymmetric dimethylarginine and C-reactive protein, explaining all-cause mortality (HR 15.21 CI 3.50-66.12 P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in non-diabetic patients in hemodialysis. Other risk factors may overlap asymmetric dimethylarginine in people with diabetes. Inflammation dramatically increases the risk of death associated with high plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine in hemodialysis.

Association of the nutritional risk index for Japanese hemodialysis with mortality and dietary nutritional intake in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization.

AIM: The nutritional risk index for Japanese hemodialysis (NRI-JH) is a nutritional screening tool for predicting mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis; however, its utility in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization who have a high risk of protein-energy wasting, is unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed hospitalized patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term care at a single hospital. The NRI-JH was calculated using body mass index, serum albumin level, total cholesterol level, and serum creatinine level. The patients were categorized into three risk groups-low, medium, and high. Dietary energy and protein intake were evaluated by dietitians. The association of NRI-JH risk with nutritional intake and mortality were examined. RESULTS: In total, 133 patients were analyzed. The NRI-JH risk was low in 24%, medium in 26%, and high in 50% of the patients. The patients in the high-risk group were older and had lower energy and protein intakes than those in the low- and medium-risk groups. High-risk patients showed shorter survival times than low- and medium-risk patients, and a high NRI-JH risk was associated with a high mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-4.77; p < 0.05). The association weakened when protein intake and C-reactive protein level were added as covariates (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.95-4.28, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: High NRI-JH risk was associated with low dietary nutritional intake and poor survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis during long-term hospitalization. Nutritional status evaluation and nutritional interventions may improve prognosis in this population.

Parathyroidectomy vs Cinacalcet Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

CONTEXT: Parathyroidectomy (PTx) and cinacalcet are both effective treatments for secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients, but limited data exist comparing the long-term outcomes of these interventions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the risk of mortality among hemodialysis patients who underwent PTx and those who started treatment with cinacalcet. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, comprising patients from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry, patients who had intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels ≥ 300 pg/mL in late 2007 and underwent PTx or started treatment with cinacalcet in 2008 to 2009 were matched by propensity score at 1:3. PTx and cinacalcet were compared for all-cause mortality within 6 years. RESULTS: Among eligible patients, 894 patients who underwent PTx were matched with 2682 patients who started treatment with cinacalcet. The median baseline intact PTH levels were 588 pg/mL and 566 pg/mL in the PTx and cinacalcet groups, respectively. PTx resulted in greater reductions in intact PTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels compared with cinacalcet. During the 6-year follow-up period, 201 patients (22.5%) in the PTx group and 736 patients (27.4%) in the cinacalcet group died. PTx was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with cinacalcet (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.91]; P = 0.002). This association was more pronounced in patients with intact PTH levels ≥ 500 pg/mL and in patients with serum calcium levels ≥ 10.0 mg/dL (both P for interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PTx compared with cinacalcet is associated with a lower risk of mortality, particularly among patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Paclitaxel coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in dysfunctional dialysis arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety between paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty and conventional balloon (CB) angioplasty in the treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula (AVF). METHODS: We searched four major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception through November 28, 2021. Outcomes of interest included target lesion primary patency (TLPP), technical success and all-cause mortality. The STATA package version 15.1 was utilized to undertake meta-analyses. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs totaling 1535 patients were analyzed. The available data showed that there were no significant differences of TLPP rates at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months between the PCB group and the CB group (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.07, p = 1.000, I2 = 33.5%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.185, fixed-effect model; RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.99-1.39, p = 0.065, I2 = 75.4%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.000, random-effect model; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.35-1.89, p = 0.625, I2 = 62.8%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.045, random-effect model; RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97-1.47, p = 0.096, I2 = 40.5%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.071, random-effect model). In addition, two groups had similar technical success rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03, p = 1.000, I2 = 0.0%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.596, fixed-effect model) and all-cause mortality rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.54-1.84, p = 1.000, I2 = 0.0%, Cochrane Q test p = 0.599, fixed-effect model). CONCLUSIONS: PCB angioplasty did not appear to convey any obvious advantage over CB angioplasty in the treatment of dysfunctional AVF. However, further multi-center, large-scale and well-designed RCTs are needed to prove outcomes.

Characteristics and predictors of mortality on haemodialysis in Brazil: a cohort of 5,081 incident patients.

BACKGROUND: Although Brazil has one of the largest populations on haemodialysis (HD) in the world, data regarding patients' characteristics and the variables associated with risk of death are scanty. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who initiated on maintenance HD at 23 dialysis centres in Brazil between 2012 and 2017. Patients were censored after 60 months of follow-up or at the end of 2019. RESULTS: A total of 5,081 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 59 years, 59.4% were men, 37.5% had diabetes as the cause of kidney failure. Almost 70% had a central venous catheter (CVC) as the initial vascular access, about 60% started dialysis in the hospital, and fluid overload (FO) by bioimpedance assessment was seen in 45% of patients. The 60-month survival rate was 51.4%. In the Cox regression analysis, being older (P<0.0001), starting dialysis in the hospital (P=0.016), having diabetes as the cause of kidney failure (P=0.001), high alkaline phosphatase (P=0.005), CVC as first vascular access (P=0.023), and FO (P<0.0001) were associated with higher death risk, whereas higher body mass index (P=0.015), haemoglobin (P=0.004), transferrin saturation (P=0.002), and serum albumin (P<0.0001) were associated with better survival. The same variables, except initial CVC use (P=0.14), were associated with death risk in an analysis of subdistribution proportional hazards ratio including the competing outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The present study gives an overview of a large HD population in a developing country and identifies the main predictors of mortality, including some potentially modifiable ones, such as unplanned initiation of dialysis in the hospital and fluid overload.

Sex differences in the 10-year survival of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in the Q-Cohort Study.

Women have a longer life expectancy than men in the general population. However, it has remained unclear whether this advantage is maintained in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of mortality, especially infection-related mortality, between male and female hemodialysis patients. A total of 3065 Japanese hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 18 years old were followed up for 10 years. The primary outcomes were all-cause and infection-related mortality. The associations between sex and these outcomes were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. During the median follow-up of 8.8 years, 1498 patients died of any cause, 387 of whom died of infection. Compared with men, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause and infection-related mortality in women were 0.51 (0.45-0.58, P < 0.05) and 0.36 (0.27-0.47, P < 0.05), respectively. These findings remained significant even when propensity score-matching or inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment methods were employed. Furthermore, even when the non-infection-related mortality was considered a competing risk, the infection-related mortality rate in women was still significantly lower than that in men. Regarding all-cause and infection-related deaths, women have a survival advantage compared with men among Japanese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.